feat: Initial compilation; sections; complaint.
Let's get ROWDY. <Oh, God knows (God knows) I'm not going back.>
This commit is contained in:
63
LAB3.tex
63
LAB3.tex
@@ -1,11 +1,12 @@
|
||||
\documentclass{article}
|
||||
|
||||
\usepackage[margin=1in]{geometry}
|
||||
|
||||
\usepackage{graphicx}
|
||||
\usepackage{minted}
|
||||
\usepackage{amsmath}
|
||||
\newcommand{\RE}[1]{\mathrm{Re} \left \{ #1 \right \}}
|
||||
\newcommand{\IM}[1]{\mathrm{Im} \left \{ #1 \right \}}
|
||||
|
||||
\usepackage{longtable,booktabs,array}
|
||||
|
||||
\usepackage{commath}
|
||||
\newcommand\numberthis{\addtocounter{equation}{1}\tag{\theequation}}
|
||||
@@ -23,4 +24,62 @@
|
||||
\begin{document}
|
||||
\maketitle
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Introduction}
|
||||
In this lab, we investigate the response of a circuit (seen in figure
|
||||
\ref{img:circuit_diagram}) to different sinusoidal signals. We apply
|
||||
both symbolic analysis and numeric analysis (simulation) to affirm
|
||||
that this causal LTI system will always generate a sinusoidal response
|
||||
of the same frequency as that provided to it.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[h]
|
||||
\caption{A diagram of our two-stage RC circuit, with a fixed-gain amplifier between the two stages to act as a buffer}
|
||||
\label{img:circuit_diagram}
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{circuit_diagram}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Discussion}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Measurement data and/or Results}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Discusison of Measurements, experiments and/or simulations}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Summary and Conclusions}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{A complaint}
|
||||
Cut the standard lab format. I wrote this as a complaint before I
|
||||
really started working on this lab.
|
||||
|
||||
I'm going to be frank with you:
|
||||
|
||||
Completing these labs is painful.
|
||||
|
||||
The lab description itself is 16 pages long.
|
||||
|
||||
Every part of the lab reads the same way a 4'' paintbrush dunked in a
|
||||
bucket of red paint and splattered across a wall looks.
|
||||
|
||||
The writer gives a thousand times more information than you need, and
|
||||
instructs you to do things .... a million things.
|
||||
|
||||
And then, at the end of the lab, a description of what you're actually
|
||||
supposed to submit is given. The two are so loosely connected ... it
|
||||
means there is no one good strategy to break things down and start
|
||||
working. You just have to keep reading and re-reading, looking for
|
||||
parts or aspects you haven't covered, and then you have to sew all
|
||||
those harvested organs of incomplete understanding into a cadaver,
|
||||
packing dozens of lungs, livers and kidneys in however they'll fit, as
|
||||
though enough organs will bring a corpse to life.
|
||||
|
||||
I had a much better time understanding it, now that I'm re-reading the
|
||||
whole thing very carefully and following the math being demonstrated,
|
||||
but it's no wonder everyone hates these labs.
|
||||
|
||||
It's insanely punishing if you haven't read the lab before you start
|
||||
doing the procedure.
|
||||
|
||||
Did I mention that the lab description (which contains the procedure)
|
||||
isn't released until 15 minutes before the Lab section?
|
||||
|
||||
\end{document}
|
||||
|
||||
5
Makefile
Normal file
5
Makefile
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
|
||||
run:
|
||||
python3 ./lab2_fixed.py
|
||||
|
||||
build:
|
||||
pdflatex -shell-escape -file-line-error -interaction=nonstopmode LAB3.tex
|
||||
BIN
circuit_diagram.png
Normal file
BIN
circuit_diagram.png
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 33 KiB |
Reference in New Issue
Block a user