hurricos/openwrt
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity
818e6e847c
openwrt/target/linux/s3c24xx/patches-2.6.26/1188-touchscreen-meddling.patch.patch
Mirko Vogt c931b21161 change prefix for kernelpatchbase 2.6.26 
SVN-Revision: 13619
2008-12-13 01:54:56 +00:00

506 lines
17 KiB
Diff
Executable File
Raw Blame History

From 76d6ab9228efca87d3e6db46e918c7bbf19f6540 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andy Green <andy@openmoko.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:06:16 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] touchscreen-meddling.patch
Touchscreen on GTA01-02 experiences noise on the channel that serves the
"tall axis" of the LCM. The sample quality of the other axis is good.
The bad samples have a characteristic of one shot excursions that can
reach +/- 20% or more of the sample average.
Previously, we had a simple averaging scheme going in the touchscreen
driver that summed up 32 x and ys and then divided it by 32. This patch
first tidies up the existing code for style, then adds a new "running
average" concept with a FIFO. The running average is separate from the
summing average mentioned above, and is accurate for the last n samples
sample-by-sample, where n is set by 1 << excursion_filter_len_bits in the
machine / platform stuff.
The heuristic the patch implements for the filtering is to accept all
samples, but tag the *previous* sample with a flag if it differed from
the running average by more than reject_threshold_vs_avg in either
axis. The next sample time, a beauty contest is held if the flag was
set to decide if we think the previous sample was a one-shot excursion
(detected by the new sample being closer to the average than to the
flagged previous sample), or if we believe we are moving (detected by
the new sample being closer to the flagged previous sample than the
average. In the case that we believe the previous sample was an
excursion, we simply overwrite it with the new data and adjust the
summing average to use the new data instead of the excursion data.
I only tested this by eyeballing the output of ts_print_raw, but it
seemed to be quite a bit better. Gross movement appeared to be
tracked fine too. If folks want to try different heuristics on top
of this patch, be my guest; either way feedback on what it looks like
with a graphical app would be good.
Signed-off-by: Andy Green <andy@openmoko.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-s3c2440/mach-gta02.c | 10 +-
drivers/input/touchscreen/s3c2410_ts.c | 256 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
include/asm-arm/arch-s3c2410/ts.h | 8 +-
3 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c2440/mach-gta02.c b/arch/arm/mach-s3c2440/mach-gta02.c
index c32bb2a..afe8039 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c2440/mach-gta02.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c2440/mach-gta02.c
@@ -897,10 +897,18 @@ static struct s3c2410_udc_mach_info gta02_udc_cfg = {
static struct s3c2410_ts_mach_info gta02_ts_cfg = {
.delay = 10000,
- .presc = 65,
+ .presc = 50000000 / 1000000, /* 50 MHz PCLK / 1MHz */
+ /* simple averaging, 2^n samples */
.oversampling_shift = 5,
+ /* averaging filter length, 2^n */
+ .excursion_filter_len_bits = 5,
+ /* flagged for beauty contest on next sample if differs from
+ * average more than this
+ */
+ .reject_threshold_vs_avg = 2,
};
+
/* SPI: LCM control interface attached to Glamo3362 */
static void gta02_jbt6k74_reset(int devidx, int level)
diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/s3c2410_ts.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/s3c2410_ts.c
index 1251454..b1ba73d 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/s3c2410_ts.c
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/s3c2410_ts.c
@@ -36,6 +36,9 @@
*
* 2007-05-23: Harald Welte <laforge@openmoko.org>
* - Add proper support for S32440
+ *
+ * 2008-06-18: Andy Green <andy@openmoko.com>
+ * - Outlier removal
*/
#include <linux/errno.h>
@@ -62,11 +65,16 @@
#define TSC_SLEEP (S3C2410_ADCTSC_PULL_UP_DISABLE | S3C2410_ADCTSC_XY_PST(0))
#define WAIT4INT(x) (((x)<<8) | \
- S3C2410_ADCTSC_YM_SEN | S3C2410_ADCTSC_YP_SEN | S3C2410_ADCTSC_XP_SEN | \
+ S3C2410_ADCTSC_YM_SEN | \
+ S3C2410_ADCTSC_YP_SEN | \
+ S3C2410_ADCTSC_XP_SEN | \
S3C2410_ADCTSC_XY_PST(3))
-#define AUTOPST (S3C2410_ADCTSC_YM_SEN | S3C2410_ADCTSC_YP_SEN | S3C2410_ADCTSC_XP_SEN | \
- S3C2410_ADCTSC_AUTO_PST | S3C2410_ADCTSC_XY_PST(0))
+#define AUTOPST (S3C2410_ADCTSC_YM_SEN | \
+ S3C2410_ADCTSC_YP_SEN | \
+ S3C2410_ADCTSC_XP_SEN | \
+ S3C2410_ADCTSC_AUTO_PST | \
+ S3C2410_ADCTSC_XY_PST(0))
#define DEBUG_LVL KERN_DEBUG
@@ -85,17 +93,46 @@ static char *s3c2410ts_name = "s3c2410 TouchScreen";
* Per-touchscreen data.
*/
+struct s3c2410ts_sample {
+ int x;
+ int y;
+};
+
struct s3c2410ts {
struct input_dev *dev;
long xp;
long yp;
int count;
int shift;
+ int extent; /* 1 << shift */
+
+ /* the raw sample fifo is a lightweight way to track a running average
+ * of all taken samples. "running average" here means that it gives
+ * correct average for each sample, not only at the end of block of
+ * samples
+ */
+ int excursion_filter_len;
+ struct s3c2410ts_sample *raw_sample_fifo;
+ int head_raw_fifo;
+ int tail_raw_fifo;
+ struct s3c2410ts_sample raw_running_avg;
+ int reject_threshold_vs_avg;
+ int flag_previous_exceeded_threshold;
};
static struct s3c2410ts ts;
static void __iomem *base_addr;
+static void clear_raw_fifo(void)
+{
+ ts.head_raw_fifo = 0;
+ ts.tail_raw_fifo = 0;
+ ts.raw_running_avg.x = 0;
+ ts.raw_running_avg.y = 0;
+ ts.flag_previous_exceeded_threshold = 0;
+}
+
+
static inline void s3c2410_ts_connect(void)
{
s3c2410_gpio_cfgpin(S3C2410_GPG12, S3C2410_GPG12_XMON);
@@ -110,47 +147,52 @@ static void touch_timer_fire(unsigned long data)
unsigned long data1;
int updown;
- data0 = readl(base_addr+S3C2410_ADCDAT0);
- data1 = readl(base_addr+S3C2410_ADCDAT1);
+ data0 = readl(base_addr + S3C2410_ADCDAT0);
+ data1 = readl(base_addr + S3C2410_ADCDAT1);
- updown = (!(data0 & S3C2410_ADCDAT0_UPDOWN)) && (!(data1 & S3C2410_ADCDAT0_UPDOWN));
+ updown = (!(data0 & S3C2410_ADCDAT0_UPDOWN)) &&
+ (!(data1 & S3C2410_ADCDAT0_UPDOWN));
- if (updown) {
- if (ts.count != 0) {
- ts.xp >>= ts.shift;
- ts.yp >>= ts.shift;
+ if (updown) {
+ if (ts.count != 0) {
+ ts.xp >>= ts.shift;
+ ts.yp >>= ts.shift;
#ifdef CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_S3C2410_DEBUG
- {
- struct timeval tv;
- do_gettimeofday(&tv);
- printk(DEBUG_LVL "T: %06d, X: %03ld, Y: %03ld\n", (int)tv.tv_usec, ts.xp, ts.yp);
- }
+ {
+ struct timeval tv;
+
+ do_gettimeofday(&tv);
+ printk(DEBUG_LVL "T:%06d, X:%03ld, Y:%03ld\n",
+ (int)tv.tv_usec, ts.xp, ts.yp);
+ }
#endif
- input_report_abs(ts.dev, ABS_X, ts.xp);
- input_report_abs(ts.dev, ABS_Y, ts.yp);
+ input_report_abs(ts.dev, ABS_X, ts.xp);
+ input_report_abs(ts.dev, ABS_Y, ts.yp);
- input_report_key(ts.dev, BTN_TOUCH, 1);
- input_report_abs(ts.dev, ABS_PRESSURE, 1);
- input_sync(ts.dev);
- }
+ input_report_key(ts.dev, BTN_TOUCH, 1);
+ input_report_abs(ts.dev, ABS_PRESSURE, 1);
+ input_sync(ts.dev);
+ }
- ts.xp = 0;
- ts.yp = 0;
- ts.count = 0;
+ ts.xp = 0;
+ ts.yp = 0;
+ ts.count = 0;
- writel(S3C2410_ADCTSC_PULL_UP_DISABLE | AUTOPST, base_addr+S3C2410_ADCTSC);
- writel(readl(base_addr+S3C2410_ADCCON) | S3C2410_ADCCON_ENABLE_START, base_addr+S3C2410_ADCCON);
- } else {
- ts.count = 0;
+ writel(S3C2410_ADCTSC_PULL_UP_DISABLE | AUTOPST,
+ base_addr+S3C2410_ADCTSC);
+ writel(readl(base_addr+S3C2410_ADCCON) |
+ S3C2410_ADCCON_ENABLE_START, base_addr+S3C2410_ADCCON);
+ } else {
+ ts.count = 0;
- input_report_key(ts.dev, BTN_TOUCH, 0);
- input_report_abs(ts.dev, ABS_PRESSURE, 0);
- input_sync(ts.dev);
+ input_report_key(ts.dev, BTN_TOUCH, 0);
+ input_report_abs(ts.dev, ABS_PRESSURE, 0);
+ input_sync(ts.dev);
- writel(WAIT4INT(0), base_addr+S3C2410_ADCTSC);
- }
+ writel(WAIT4INT(0), base_addr+S3C2410_ADCTSC);
+ }
}
static struct timer_list touch_timer =
@@ -165,7 +207,8 @@ static irqreturn_t stylus_updown(int irq, void *dev_id)
data0 = readl(base_addr+S3C2410_ADCDAT0);
data1 = readl(base_addr+S3C2410_ADCDAT1);
- updown = (!(data0 & S3C2410_ADCDAT0_UPDOWN)) && (!(data1 & S3C2410_ADCDAT0_UPDOWN));
+ updown = (!(data0 & S3C2410_ADCDAT0_UPDOWN)) &&
+ (!(data1 & S3C2410_ADCDAT0_UPDOWN));
/* TODO we should never get an interrupt with updown set while
* the timer is running, but maybe we ought to verify that the
@@ -180,24 +223,94 @@ static irqreturn_t stylus_updown(int irq, void *dev_id)
static irqreturn_t stylus_action(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
- unsigned long data0;
- unsigned long data1;
-
- data0 = readl(base_addr+S3C2410_ADCDAT0);
- data1 = readl(base_addr+S3C2410_ADCDAT1);
+ unsigned long x;
+ unsigned long y;
+ int length = (ts.head_raw_fifo - ts.tail_raw_fifo) & (ts.extent - 1);
+ int scaled_avg_x = ts.raw_running_avg.x / length;
+ int scaled_avg_y = ts.raw_running_avg.y / length;
+
+ x = readl(base_addr + S3C2410_ADCDAT0) & S3C2410_ADCDAT0_XPDATA_MASK;
+ y = readl(base_addr + S3C2410_ADCDAT1) & S3C2410_ADCDAT1_YPDATA_MASK;
+
+ /* we appear to accept every sample into both the running average FIFO
+ * and the summing average. BUT, if the last sample crossed a
+ * machine-set threshold, each time we do a beauty contest
+ * on the new sample comparing if it is closer to the running
+ * average and the previous sample. If it is closer to the previous
+ * suspicious sample, we assume the change is real and accept both
+ * if the new sample has returned to being closer to the average than
+ * the previous sample, we take the previous sample as an excursion
+ * and overwrite it in both the running average and summing average.
+ */
+
+ if (ts.flag_previous_exceeded_threshold)
+ /* new one closer to "nonconformist" previous, or average?
+ * Pythagoras? Who? Don't need it because large excursion
+ * will be accounted for correctly this way
+ */
+ if ((abs(x - scaled_avg_x) + abs(y - scaled_avg_y)) <
+ (abs(x - ts.raw_sample_fifo[(ts.head_raw_fifo - 1) &
+ (ts.extent - 1)].x) +
+ abs(y - ts.raw_sample_fifo[(ts.head_raw_fifo - 1) &
+ (ts.extent - 1)].y))) {
+ /* it's closer to average, reject previous as a one-
+ * shot excursion, by overwriting it
+ */
+ ts.xp += x - ts.raw_sample_fifo[(ts.head_raw_fifo - 1) &
+ (ts.extent - 1)].x;
+ ts.yp += y - ts.raw_sample_fifo[(ts.head_raw_fifo - 1) &
+ (ts.extent - 1)].y;
+ ts.raw_sample_fifo[(ts.head_raw_fifo - 1) &
+ (ts.extent - 1)].x = x;
+ ts.raw_sample_fifo[(ts.head_raw_fifo - 1) &
+ (ts.extent - 1)].y = y;
+ /* no new sample: replaced previous, so we are done */
+ goto completed;
+ }
+ /* else it was closer to nonconformist previous: it's likely
+ * a genuine consistent move then.
+ * Keep previous and add new guy.
+ */
+
+ if ((x >= scaled_avg_x - ts.reject_threshold_vs_avg) &&
+ (x <= scaled_avg_x + ts.reject_threshold_vs_avg) &&
+ (y >= scaled_avg_y - ts.reject_threshold_vs_avg) &&
+ (y <= scaled_avg_y + ts.reject_threshold_vs_avg))
+ ts.flag_previous_exceeded_threshold = 0;
+ else
+ ts.flag_previous_exceeded_threshold = 1;
- ts.xp += data0 & S3C2410_ADCDAT0_XPDATA_MASK;
- ts.yp += data1 & S3C2410_ADCDAT1_YPDATA_MASK;
+ /* accepted */
+ ts.xp += x;
+ ts.yp += y;
ts.count++;
- if (ts.count < (1<<ts.shift)) {
- writel(S3C2410_ADCTSC_PULL_UP_DISABLE | AUTOPST, base_addr+S3C2410_ADCTSC);
- writel(readl(base_addr+S3C2410_ADCCON) | S3C2410_ADCCON_ENABLE_START, base_addr+S3C2410_ADCCON);
- } else {
- mod_timer(&touch_timer, jiffies+1);
+ /* remove oldest sample from avg when we have full pipeline */
+ if (((ts.head_raw_fifo + 1) & (ts.extent - 1)) == ts.tail_raw_fifo) {
+ ts.raw_running_avg.x -= ts.raw_sample_fifo[ts.tail_raw_fifo].x;
+ ts.raw_running_avg.y -= ts.raw_sample_fifo[ts.tail_raw_fifo].y;
+ ts.tail_raw_fifo = (ts.tail_raw_fifo + 1) & (ts.extent - 1);
+ }
+ /* always add current sample to fifo and average */
+ ts.raw_sample_fifo[ts.head_raw_fifo].x = x;
+ ts.raw_sample_fifo[ts.head_raw_fifo].y = y;
+ ts.raw_running_avg.x += x;
+ ts.raw_running_avg.y += y;
+ ts.head_raw_fifo = (ts.head_raw_fifo + 1) & (ts.extent - 1);
+
+completed:
+ if (ts.count >= (1 << ts.shift)) {
+ mod_timer(&touch_timer, jiffies + 1);
writel(WAIT4INT(1), base_addr+S3C2410_ADCTSC);
+ goto bail;
}
+ writel(S3C2410_ADCTSC_PULL_UP_DISABLE | AUTOPST,
+ base_addr+S3C2410_ADCTSC);
+ writel(readl(base_addr+S3C2410_ADCCON) |
+ S3C2410_ADCCON_ENABLE_START, base_addr+S3C2410_ADCCON);
+
+bail:
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
@@ -213,11 +326,11 @@ static int __init s3c2410ts_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct s3c2410_ts_mach_info *info;
struct input_dev *input_dev;
- info = ( struct s3c2410_ts_mach_info *)pdev->dev.platform_data;
+ info = (struct s3c2410_ts_mach_info *)pdev->dev.platform_data;
if (!info)
{
- printk(KERN_ERR "Hm... too bad : no platform data for ts\n");
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Hm... too bad: no platform data for ts\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -227,7 +340,7 @@ static int __init s3c2410ts_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
adc_clock = clk_get(NULL, "adc");
if (!adc_clock) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "failed to get adc clock source\n");
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get adc clock source\n");
return -ENOENT;
}
clk_enable(adc_clock);
@@ -238,7 +351,7 @@ static int __init s3c2410ts_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
base_addr = ioremap(S3C2410_PA_ADC,0x20);
if (base_addr == NULL) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to remap register block\n");
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to remap register block\n");
return -ENOMEM;
}
@@ -247,25 +360,26 @@ static int __init s3c2410ts_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (!strcmp(pdev->name, "s3c2410-ts"))
s3c2410_ts_connect();
- if ((info->presc&0xff) > 0)
- writel(S3C2410_ADCCON_PRSCEN | S3C2410_ADCCON_PRSCVL(info->presc&0xFF),\
- base_addr+S3C2410_ADCCON);
+ if ((info->presc & 0xff) > 0)
+ writel(S3C2410_ADCCON_PRSCEN |
+ S3C2410_ADCCON_PRSCVL(info->presc&0xFF),
+ base_addr + S3C2410_ADCCON);
else
- writel(0,base_addr+S3C2410_ADCCON);
+ writel(0, base_addr+S3C2410_ADCCON);
/* Initialise registers */
- if ((info->delay&0xffff) > 0)
- writel(info->delay & 0xffff, base_addr+S3C2410_ADCDLY);
+ if ((info->delay & 0xffff) > 0)
+ writel(info->delay & 0xffff, base_addr + S3C2410_ADCDLY);
- writel(WAIT4INT(0), base_addr+S3C2410_ADCTSC);
+ writel(WAIT4INT(0), base_addr + S3C2410_ADCTSC);
/* Initialise input stuff */
memset(&ts, 0, sizeof(struct s3c2410ts));
input_dev = input_allocate_device();
if (!input_dev) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "Unable to allocate the input device !!\n");
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to allocate the input device\n");
return -ENOMEM;
}
@@ -284,23 +398,30 @@ static int __init s3c2410ts_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
ts.dev->id.version = S3C2410TSVERSION;
ts.shift = info->oversampling_shift;
+ ts.extent = 1 << info->oversampling_shift;
+ ts.reject_threshold_vs_avg = info->reject_threshold_vs_avg;
+ ts.excursion_filter_len = 1 << info->excursion_filter_len_bits;
+
+ ts.raw_sample_fifo = kmalloc(sizeof(struct s3c2410ts_sample) *
+ ts.excursion_filter_len, GFP_KERNEL);
+ clear_raw_fifo();
/* Get irqs */
if (request_irq(IRQ_ADC, stylus_action, IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM,
- "s3c2410_action", ts.dev)) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "s3c2410_ts.c: Could not allocate ts IRQ_ADC !\n");
+ "s3c2410_action", ts.dev)) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not allocate ts IRQ_ADC !\n");
iounmap(base_addr);
return -EIO;
}
if (request_irq(IRQ_TC, stylus_updown, IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM,
"s3c2410_action", ts.dev)) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "s3c2410_ts.c: Could not allocate ts IRQ_TC !\n");
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not allocate ts IRQ_TC !\n");
free_irq(IRQ_ADC, ts.dev);
iounmap(base_addr);
return -EIO;
}
- printk(KERN_INFO "%s successfully loaded\n", s3c2410ts_name);
+ dev_info(&pdev->dev, "successfully loaded\n");
/* All went ok, so register to the input system */
rc = input_register_device(ts.dev);
@@ -328,6 +449,8 @@ static int s3c2410ts_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
adc_clock = NULL;
}
+ kfree(ts.raw_sample_fifo);
+
input_unregister_device(ts.dev);
iounmap(base_addr);
@@ -357,17 +480,20 @@ static int s3c2410ts_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
clk_enable(adc_clock);
mdelay(1);
+ clear_raw_fifo();
+
enable_irq(IRQ_ADC);
enable_irq(IRQ_TC);
if ((info->presc&0xff) > 0)
- writel(S3C2410_ADCCON_PRSCEN | S3C2410_ADCCON_PRSCVL(info->presc&0xFF),\
- base_addr+S3C2410_ADCCON);
+ writel(S3C2410_ADCCON_PRSCEN |
+ S3C2410_ADCCON_PRSCVL(info->presc&0xFF),
+ base_addr+S3C2410_ADCCON);
else
writel(0,base_addr+S3C2410_ADCCON);
/* Initialise registers */
- if ((info->delay&0xffff) > 0)
+ if ((info->delay & 0xffff) > 0)
writel(info->delay & 0xffff, base_addr+S3C2410_ADCDLY);
writel(WAIT4INT(0), base_addr+S3C2410_ADCTSC);
diff --git a/include/asm-arm/arch-s3c2410/ts.h b/include/asm-arm/arch-s3c2410/ts.h
index 593632a..44c1e4b 100644
--- a/include/asm-arm/arch-s3c2410/ts.h
+++ b/include/asm-arm/arch-s3c2410/ts.h
@@ -17,9 +17,11 @@
#define __ASM_ARM_TS_H
struct s3c2410_ts_mach_info {
- int delay;
- int presc;
- int oversampling_shift;
+ int delay;
+ int presc;
+ int oversampling_shift;
+ int excursion_filter_len_bits;
+ int reject_threshold_vs_avg;
};
void set_s3c2410ts_info(struct s3c2410_ts_mach_info *hard_s3c2410ts_info);
--
1.5.6.3
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink