feat: Initial plots

LAB3.tex

@@ -62,46 +62,59 @@ $(\SI{50}{\hertz}, \SI{100}{\hertz}, \SI{2}{V}, \SI{4}{V})$.
 As with 2.2.a, but with $x(t) = A \sin(\omega t - 0.025)$, for
 $A = 1 V_{pp}, f = \SI{10}{\hertz}$ (i.e., a 0.025 second delay).
 
-
 \section{Measurement data and/or Results}
 
+\subsubsection{Lab3 section 2.2.a.}
+
+Figures \ref{img:1hz_show}, \ref{img:5hz_show}, \ref{img:10hz_show}
+and \ref{img:100hz_show} depict a theoretical $1V_{pp}$ input at
+$f \in \left \{1, 5, 10, 100 \right \} \SI{}{\hertz}$, with output
+calculated first by convolution with the impulse response, then by
+solution of the representative ODE, and finally our experimentally
+measured input and output.
+
+\begin{figure}[h]
+  \caption{A $1V_{pp}$ @ $\SI{1}{\hertz}$ input to our circuit, in theory and in practice, and respective outputs}
+  \label{img:1hz_show}
+  \centering
+  \includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{img/1hz_show}
+\end{figure}
+
+\begin{figure}[h]
+  \caption{A $1V_{pp}$ @ $\SI{5}{\hertz}$ input to our circuit, in theory and in practice, and respective outputs}
+  \label{img:5hz_show}
+  \centering
+  \includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{img/5hz_show}
+\end{figure}
+
+\begin{figure}[h]
+  \caption{A $1V_{pp}$ @ $\SI{10}{\hertz}$ input to our circuit, in theory and in practice, and respective outputs}
+  \label{img:10hz_show}
+  \centering
+  \includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{img/10hz_show}
+\end{figure}
+
+\begin{figure}[h]
+  \caption{A $1V_{pp}$ @ $\SI{100}{\hertz}$ input to our circuit, in theory and in practice, and respective outputs}
+  \label{img:100hz_show}
+  \centering
+  \includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{img/100hz_show}
+\end{figure}
+
+
+\subsubsection{Lab3 section 2.2.b.}
+
+$x_1(t) + x_2(t)$, with $x_1(t) = A_1 \sin(\omega_1 t)$,
+$x_2(t) = A_2 \sin(\omega_2 t)$, and $(f_1, f_2, A_1, A_2)$ with such
+values as
+$(\SI{50}{\hertz}, \SI{100}{\hertz}, \SI{1}{V}, \SI{0.5}{V})$ and
+$(\SI{50}{\hertz}, \SI{100}{\hertz}, \SI{2}{V}, \SI{4}{V})$.
+
+\subsubsection{Lab3 section 2.2.c.}
+
+
 \section{Discusison of Measurements, experiments and/or simulations}
 
 \section{Summary and Conclusions}
 
-\subsection{A complaint}
-Cut the standard lab format. I wrote this as a complaint before I
-really started working on this lab.
-
-I'm going to be frank with you:
-
-Completing these labs is painful.
-
-The lab description itself is 16 pages long.
-
-Every part of the lab reads the same way a 4'' paintbrush dunked in a
-bucket of red paint and splattered across a wall looks.
-
-The writer gives a thousand times more information than you need, and
-instructs you to do things .... a million things.
-
-And then, at the end of the lab, a description of what you're actually
-supposed to submit is given.  The two are so loosely connected ... it
-means there is no one good strategy to break things down and start
-working.  You just have to keep reading and re-reading, looking for
-parts or aspects you haven't covered, and then you have to sew all
-those harvested organs of incomplete understanding into a cadaver,
-packing dozens of lungs, livers and kidneys in however they'll fit, as
-though enough organs will bring a corpse to life.
-
-I had a much better time understanding it, now that I'm re-reading the
-whole thing very carefully and following the math being demonstrated,
-but it's no wonder everyone hates these labs.
-
-It's insanely punishing if you haven't read the lab before you start
-doing the procedure.
-
-Did I mention that the lab description (which contains the procedure)
-isn't released until 15 minutes before the Lab section?
-
 \end{document}